BTCNN aim to be the key source for both digital currency experts and newbies. With the cryptocurrency industry growing so fast we want to educate our readers about all the latest developments as they happen.

EOS Rollback: First Transaction Undone By Its Government

The EOS government is rolling back transactions, as an arbitration report made public today shows. The paper states that the resolution to roll back the transaction answers to the fact that the hacker took control of it in a phishing attack. Despite this, this fact has alerted some about the dangers that an EOS rollback policy brings.

EOS Rollback Activated

EOS Blockchain Has Rolled Back Its First TransactionEOS, one of the top 5 cryptocurrencies, has the power to roll back transactions on its blockchain. This is already happening, as evidenced in the ruling document made public today on social networks. The ruling states that the claimant (VH) now can possess his funds again. Written in a pseudo-legal way, it explains the reasons and justifies its ruling with a series of arguments. It even features an arbitrator and a case manager.

Supposedly a phishing attack affected the claimant, and he submitted the case to the EOS governance structure. They failed at his favor, ordering miners (Block Producers) to undo the changes made and return the funds via EOS rollback.

To some, this does seem good, because the phishing scam was nullified. But for the more cryptocurrency savvy, this is a terrible trend. Cryptocurrencies are all about trustless transactions, and not about getting third parties into the dealings. After all, that’s what they were designed to avoid since day one.

Is The EOS Approach Right?

However, this is not new, and in its time EOS rollback was advertised as a feature for the new blockchain. The ability to roll back changes to the blockchain via an arbitration process. This arbitration process would rule about any controversies regarding EOS funds. But this focus brings a series of problems with them.

Blockchain and smart contracts system are trustless. This means that no people can be in charge of them and the platform must manage this by itself. The introduction of a third party that can rule over transactions seems to go against this fact. Also, blockchain is meant to be an immutable ledger. To modify it (even if it is for good) seems to deprive it of that.

EOS Blockchain Has Rolled Back Its First Transaction
Part of the ruling document

The approach of arbitration also brings other operational concerns. If EOS in the future manage to scale big enough to serve as an important currency, what will happen if hack attempts multiply? This is a good question, as these procedures will be more and more common. The currency might not be able to scale because its incapability to process every requirement.

Now, this adds up to the bad reputation that EOS has with smart contract hacks lately. But this does not seem to affect China’s consideration about EOS. They still rank it number one among all cryptocurrencies.

Latest articles

‘Only in Crypto’: What the OKEx Mess Says About New and Old Finance

On Friday morning as the OKEx withdrawal-freeze story twisted and turned, CoinDesk's editors had an off-the-cuff discussion about the fundamental realities and unique challenges...

Coinbase Custody’s new token support faces criticism

Earlier today, Coinbase Custody announced that they are looking into adding support for new digital assets. The move to support more coins comes as...

Bitcoin’s Creator vs. Bezos: Satoshi Nakamoto’s Uphill Climb to Surpass the Amazon Founder’s Net Worth

Jeff Bezos is the world’s richest man, but someday if bitcoin crosses a certain valuation then Satoshi Nakamoto will be the wealthiest if he/she...

Bitcoin vs Gold: Which investment favors your portfolio?

I get it. It's always an either-or decision between Bitcoin and gold, as a pure investment play. Since the commodity and the cryptocurrency each...